Copyright industry demand to a user died

Today we are undoubtedly before one of the cases more surrealistic, the industry of the copyright sued a user who had died.
 The case they have to see with BitTorrent's historical demand against 24.583 users. All defendants for Hurt Locker came out or to share the movie and that was overcoming the previous number reached in the case The Expendables.
 This type of massive accusations have hundreds of histories behind, since the plaintiffs only fix an IP as offender and of there contruye a base with which to begin to send the citations. The case of the blind user us was coming to demonstrate the incoherence of this system, probably that of today demonstrates the absurd thing of the same one.

Of between these 24.583 users of BitTorrent demanded by Hurt Locker's unload, this week was returned to him to the Court of Federal District of The United States one of the letters. The motive was not other one that the defendant already had died.
 The most surprising thing, as they count from TorrenFreak, it is that it is not a question of an isolated case. The same RIAA met a similar situation a time ago. Seeing that the supposed offender had died, they decided to continue forward with the case, suing then the children of the deceased citizen. It yes, stopping 60 days of duel for the death of the deceased before returning to the case. In this moment the RIAA it managed to say

The plaintiffs do not believe necessarily to discuss the resolution of the case with the family in a moment so near to the death of his father. Therefore, the plaintiffs request a stay of 60 days to have time him to the family to weeping for his death
 It sounds extremely cruelly and inhumanly, but it is true. The case that occupies us today still is for being closed, since as soon as the plaintiffs have seen that the user has died they might act in the same way as the RIAA. It would not be the first time.